In Southern California, a driver REFUSED to consent to a warrantless vehicle search..


:) 8-) ;( :D :( :O :P ;) :heart: :ermm: :angel: :angry: :alien: :blink: :blush: :cheerful: :devil: :dizzy: :getlost: :happy: :kissing: :ninja: :pinch: :pouty: :sick: :sideways: :silly: :sleeping: :unsure: :woot: :wassat:
Duration: 2:59 Views: 7.1K Submitted: 3 weeks ago Submitted by:
A motorist visiting a Southern California border area from Orange County was detained by Border Patrol agents who unlawfully demanded he stop recording, violating his First Amendment rights.

The agents threatened to search his vehicle without a warrant or articulable probable cause, leading the driver to explicitly invoke his Fourth Amendment protections against illegal search and seizure.

The video concludes with an agent appearing to physically signal a K9 unit to manufacture a false alert, which is an illegal law enforcement tactic used to bypass constitutional rights and justify an unlawful search.
Categories: Bad Day Police Bad Cop
Add comment 13 comments
:) 8-) ;( :D :( :O :P ;) :heart: :ermm: :angel: :angry: :alien: :blink: :blush: :cheerful: :devil: :dizzy: :getlost: :happy: :kissing: :ninja: :pinch: :pouty: :sick: :sideways: :silly: :sleeping: :unsure: :woot: :wassat:
0 +1 SchlongusHumongus 3 weeks ago

I remember watching this some years ago.

0 +1 morepotatoes 3 weeks ago

Oh look, more anti-law enforcement propaganda from a thumb sucking twat.

3 +1 [email protected] 3 weeks ago

No one thinks you're a dumb kid. Your edited video and stupidity proved you are dumb. Reasonable Suspicion is the standard for a traffic stop, not Probable Cause. And the Carroll Doctrine provides an exception to the Fourth Amendment, allowing warrantless searches of vehicles based on probable cause.

1 +1 Clappincheeks2knight 3 weeks ago

@[email protected] You have a "Reasonable" Suspicion, not just a suspicion...

8 +1 fatigued1969 3 weeks ago

And cops wonder why they get shot

7 +1 W1zard0f0h 3 weeks ago

Probable cause must be made up of articulable facts.

10 +1 OuterMongolia 3 weeks ago

they don't need a warrant to search a car ! This is bullshit !

3 +1 elgringodecuba 3 weeks ago

Idiot clicker

5 +1 WhiteAngloZaxxonPro 3 weeks ago

Are the wet backs invisible in his car?

1 +1 SchlongusHumongus 3 weeks ago

This happened several years ago iirc

10 +1 KateHikes 3 weeks ago

Looks like they're all okay with giving up qualified immunity and betraying their oath to uphold the Constitution. So what protects them from the penalty for treason now? Nothing.

3 +1 OuterMongolia 3 weeks ago

@KateHikes you are okay with supporting criminals are you ?

7 +1 KateHikes 3 weeks ago

@OuterMongolia Did I not make it clear that I don't support these pigs abusing a American citizen's rights? The "criminals" here are the police.

4 +1 Jobby11227vvcf 3 weeks ago

Drug-sniffing dogs have a real-world field accuracy rate of only about 44% during vehicle searches, though controlled laboratory tests show much higher accuracy between 80% and 90%.

7 +1 Mic7411 3 weeks ago

What sense would it make for border guards to need a search warrant for every car they want to check in the border area?

4 +1 Oculus_noctis 3 weeks ago

Make life difficult for them? Guess what? :D:D:D

1 +1 Clappincheeks2knight 3 weeks ago

@Oculus_noctis Make life difficult for them? You mean like they're doing the the man in this video? Their egos were just bruised because the young lad didn't roll over and let them stomp on his rights ...

8 +1 nuffsaid2 3 weeks ago

SHOULD HAVE TASED HIS ASS