I remember watching this some years ago.
In Southern California, a driver REFUSED to consent to a warrantless vehicle search..
The agents threatened to search his vehicle without a warrant or articulable probable cause, leading the driver to explicitly invoke his Fourth Amendment protections against illegal search and seizure.
The video concludes with an agent appearing to physically signal a K9 unit to manufacture a false alert, which is an illegal law enforcement tactic used to bypass constitutional rights and justify an unlawful search.
Oh look, more anti-law enforcement propaganda from a thumb sucking twat.
No one thinks you're a dumb kid. Your edited video and stupidity proved you are dumb. Reasonable Suspicion is the standard for a traffic stop, not Probable Cause. And the Carroll Doctrine provides an exception to the Fourth Amendment, allowing warrantless searches of vehicles based on probable cause.
Looks like they're all okay with giving up qualified immunity and betraying their oath to uphold the Constitution. So what protects them from the penalty for treason now? Nothing.
Drug-sniffing dogs have a real-world field accuracy rate of only about 44% during vehicle searches, though controlled laboratory tests show much higher accuracy between 80% and 90%.
What sense would it make for border guards to need a search warrant for every car they want to check in the border area?
