..and if the judge is a Freemason you can bet she will get away with it!
BOMBSHELL: Erika Kirk is LEGALLY DISQUALIFIED as Victim Rep In Tyler Robinson Trial
Duration: 5:02 Views: 330 Submitted: 3 hours ago Submitted by:
BOMBSHELL: Erika Kirk is LEGALLY DISQUALIFIED as Victim Rep In Tyler Robinson Trial—Utah Statute EXPOSED
Zach from @FinanceWolves just exposed a great point that nobody is talking about from the April 17 evidentiary hearing.
Erika Kirk does NOT legally qualify as the victim representative.
She filed to invoke speedy trial rights as Charlie’s widow… but Utah law explicitly disqualifies anyone who “appears to be accountable or otherwise criminally involved” in the crime.
The statute is crystal clear: if there is even the appearance of involvement or suspicion, you’re out.
And Erika’s alibi? It keeps changing:
Hospital parking lot with her mom?
At the airport?
Or was she at the Hopkinson Aircraft office when she got the news?
Why can’t we get a straight story months later?
The clip breaks it all down with the exact Utah statute. This isn’t conspiracy — it’s the law. And it raises massive questions about why the judge even allowed her to claim these rights.
Do you think Erika Kirk appears suspicious enough to disqualify her as victim rep?
Zach from @FinanceWolves just exposed a great point that nobody is talking about from the April 17 evidentiary hearing.
Erika Kirk does NOT legally qualify as the victim representative.
She filed to invoke speedy trial rights as Charlie’s widow… but Utah law explicitly disqualifies anyone who “appears to be accountable or otherwise criminally involved” in the crime.
The statute is crystal clear: if there is even the appearance of involvement or suspicion, you’re out.
And Erika’s alibi? It keeps changing:
Hospital parking lot with her mom?
At the airport?
Or was she at the Hopkinson Aircraft office when she got the news?
Why can’t we get a straight story months later?
The clip breaks it all down with the exact Utah statute. This isn’t conspiracy — it’s the law. And it raises massive questions about why the judge even allowed her to claim these rights.
Do you think Erika Kirk appears suspicious enough to disqualify her as victim rep?
Categories: Conspiracy & Truth Courtrooms & Legal
