The TRUTH About the Joe Kent "Vetting" Mitch Snow's STORY


:) 8-) ;( :D :( :O :P ;) :heart: :ermm: :angel: :angry: :alien: :blink: :blush: :cheerful: :devil: :dizzy: :getlost: :happy: :kissing: :ninja: :pinch: :pouty: :sick: :sideways: :silly: :sleeping: :unsure: :woot: :wassat:
Duration: 2:59 Views: 618 Submitted: 3 weeks ago Submitted by:
The TRUTH About the Joe Kent "Vetting" Mitch Snow's STORY—The Calculated ATTACK on Joe Kent and Candace Owens Exposed

The "anti-Candace" crowd and the fake-narrative spinners are trying to claim Joe Kent "illegally vetted" Mitch Snow. They couldn't be more wrong. This wasn't about "vetting" a guest for a show—it was about protecting the United States of America.

THE REAL STORY: In my opinion when Mitch Snow came forward with sensitive information about Fort Huachuca, Candace Owens didn't just "chase a headline." She performed the ultimate act of due diligence. She refused to air a single word until she could ensure two things:
Zero Risk to National Security: I believe she went to Joe Kent to ensure that sharing Mitch’s story wouldn't violate classified information laws or endanger our country.

Federal Awareness: She put Joe Kent and the Federal government on notice of what Mitch saw, hoping to forcing an investigation into the federal government's own actions. that's what i think.

THE FACTS vs. THE SPIN:

Fact 1: It was a Legal Safeguard, not a "Favor." Candace sought out the National Counterterrorism Director to ensure she wasn't exposing secrets that could harm the nation. That isn't "shady"—it’s Responsible Patriotism.

Fact 2: This VALIDATES Mitch Snow. Think about it: If Mitch’s story was "fake," why would the National Counterterrorism Director spend 15 minutes reviewing his records and give a "green light"? Joe Kent recognized the truth in those records immediately. Joe’s approval makes Mitch’s account MORE credible, not less.

Fact 3: The "Trap" Question. The opposition is weaponizing a "trap" interview where Mitch was lured into using the word "vetted." They are trying to nail Joe Kent to the wall for doing his job: reviewing potential threats and ensuring transparency for the American people.

THE BOTTOM LINE: Candace Owens and Joe Kent did exactly what "White Hats" are supposed to do. They communicated to ensure the truth reached the public legally and safely. The "retards" attacking them are just mad they don't have anything REAL to discredit @RealCandaceO , @Justice4Gr8Nate , or @joekent16jan19.

They’re trying to discredit the Fort Huachuca story by attacking the messengers. The fact that the Director of Counterterrorism deemed it credible enough to move forward tells you everything you need to know.
Add comment Be the first one to comment!
:) 8-) ;( :D :( :O :P ;) :heart: :ermm: :angel: :angry: :alien: :blink: :blush: :cheerful: :devil: :dizzy: :getlost: :happy: :kissing: :ninja: :pinch: :pouty: :sick: :sideways: :silly: :sleeping: :unsure: :woot: :wassat: