Proof the moon landing was technically Impossible

@Cranberryus There’s supposed to be a Buc-ee’s up there, ya know.

@AngusMcCrib space Beaver can't wait to try it

@Timmi13 Always been here

@kma8675309 Stop talking about things you don't understand, you low IQ but big mouth

@Bellybutton 27 + 13 freemason rats said they did you dummy

@Tuukka Bwhahahahahah...and don't forget the Nixon!

@PLUCK URANUS Nixon administration!

@watchful - stage 1 dropped into the ocean.

@watchful in reality:
stage 1 flimed in a studio
stage 2 Nasa cashed billions of dollars

@davidm Dayum, for once we agree on something!

@Cripple Because that's what you've been told?

@Cripple The original footage of the moon landing is fake as fuck, and you would have to be a moron not to notice. With AI video advancement we are truly cooked.

@PlanetaryFungus Not just the original but all footages.

@Cripple libtard teachers in corrupt school systems. That's why there's also fucking stupid

@MiTleiD Are you saying that the moon landings were real because they can be explained through physics? Or are you saying that physics prove the impossibility to land a man on the moon and safely bring him back to earth with the 1960's technology?

@PLUCK URANUS I am talking about the epidemic of idiots spreading online. About people who have absolutely no clue about a topic and who possess an arrogance and self-confidence built on stupidity, using their word salad to shit on real scientists and engineers. A few days ago, Margaret Hamilton, a true American hero of the Apollo program, died. Do you honestly believe that the people making these idiotic conspiracy videos are even remotely on the same level as Hamilton?

If someone is truly interested in the physics behind spaceflight and all the questions in that video, it's never been easier than it is today to get answers. The knowledge is accessible to everyone, and you even have access to AI that will patiently explain it to you. But conspiracy nutjobs have zero interest in knowledge. They just want to start drama and spit in people's faces rather than engage in true, constructive discussion.

@MiTleiD Not impressed with your answer. If I follow your logic, AI has the supreme answers. I just asked AI "Did Jesus perform miracles?" AI answered "Yes, according to the New Testament and mainstream historical consensus, Jesus of Nazareth was widely known during his lifetime as a miracle worker, healer, and exorcist." You might be an atheist, but when it comes to this topic, you've been duped. Keep believing in fairytales, it's very patriotic of you...

@PLUCK URANUS I never told you to ask AI for answers and blindly trust it. My point was that the knowledge is out there, it's accessible, and with AI, you actually have something that is able to explain it to you. So, if you really want the answers to the questions in that video, it's never been easier to get them.

But you don't want the answers. You never bothered to learn enough math to read and make sense of physics or rocket science books, and you don't even get the word salad people spill in those conspiracy videos. Because you're just not capable of telling word salad and real science apart.

@MiTleiD True, the "knowledge" is out there. I am very familiar with both point of views. Rather than believing in everything I see or read (the "knowledge", I use logic and facts, both of which lead me to believe that NASA faked the moon landings. Luckily, I haven't been brainwashed by religion or other hoaxes. But if you ask Amin6666, reptilians are real. There is plenty of knowledge out there...

@MiTleiD By the way, as an Atheist, I trust in observable science. The Van Allen belts, for instance, are known to be dangerous to humans. However can NASA produce the Geiger counter readings of the Van Allen belts? Then we can all know if we can get through them. Nasa says its classified. Not to mention that they "lost" the telemetry. Yeap, not very convincing. Oh, I used to work for BOEING so I know a bit about BLUEPRINTS (engineering drawings). There is no way, NASA could have lost BLUEPRINTS of "man's greatest technological achievement."

@PLUCK URANUS Close one! You almost had me there, because I was just about to write a long text explaining exactly why the astronauts easily made it through the Van Allen radiation belt and how they pulled it off. But then I remembered that people like you aren't actually interested in the truth.

If you ever change your mind, though, you'll find tons of videos by people who are way smarter than me who have tackled this topic and completely debunked every single claim made by moon landing deniers. For instance, just go to the YouTube channel Professor Dave Explains and search for 'moon'. You'll find long videos explaining in detail why moon landing denial is absolute nonsense.

@MiTleiD As I said, I'm familiar with both point of views, so no need to send me to YouTube. There is no need to debate our beliefs. Live and let live... GOD BLESS ROUGH ANAL!

@PLUCK URANUS And like I said, there aren't two points of view on this matter. There aren't two intellectually equal groups arguing about the truth.

On one hand, you have the actual scientists and engineers who know what they're doing, the kind of people who, besides building rockets that fly to the moon, built everything else we use in our daily lives.

On the other hand, you have the phonies and frauds who produce videos like this one, who have no clue what they're talking about, who would burst into tears if they had to solve the very first assignment of a first-semester physics class, and who just produce a scientific-sounding word salad that shows how clueless they are.

And then there are people like you, who, even when approaching this with good intentions, just can't tell the difference between the two groups.

Normally, I'd agree with you, live and let live. But we live in times where internet reach allows these scammers to convince many people like you, which leads to idiots winning elections and making it into our institutions, and that has negative consequences for the whole country.

That's why it can only be said over and over again: Stop being so damn gullible.

@MiTleiD "But we live in times where internet reach allows these scammers to convince many people like you, which leads to idiots winning elections and making it into our institutions, and that has negative consequences for the whole country." I'm an ATHEIST, I BELIEVE IN OBSERVABLE SCIENCE, and I think that the American voting system is corrupt, and TRUMP is the worst president ever. But you think I'm gullible. Good one. Vive la France!

@PLUCK URANUS If you fall for moon landing deniers, that's just the way it is, unfortunately. Moon landing denial and the flat earth theory are pretty much the most absurd conspiracy theories out there, and they can be debunked with basic school-level knowledge.

BTW, there's hardly anything as observable as the laws of physics, thanks to tons of experiments you can even do yourself.

But the fact that you don't fall for Trump proves there's still hope. Although it is pretty weird that you see right through Trump but still fall for moon landing deniers.

@MiTleiD Flat Earth Theory is NONESENSE.... Nice try (but cheap shot) comparing Flat Earth Theory to the moon landing deniers. Moon landing "deniers" do not reject empirical science. However, the "scientific proof" of NASA is not verifiable nor convincing. I rest my case! God bless rough anal!

@myhat Why would it matter that the government lied to the public, and even faked moon landing footage to air on TV. Why would it matter that history and science is a lie. Hmmm, I wonder.

There is overwhelming physical evidence confirming that the moon landings were fake. If you were brought up in the USA, you were brainwashed by HISTORIANS to believe that the Apollo program was man's greatest achievement. But if you were brought up elsewhere? It's funny that American presidents keep promising a return to the moon, yet the technology does not exist as Americans have never gone back (except by satellite). Keep believing the fairytale.

@myhat It would be yet another billions wasted

@PLUCK URANUS based on what?
You saying so?

Oh, you so funny...

@tommix1 Oh yeah...show me the technology, the telemetry. We can't land today as we couldn't 50 years ago.

@tommix1 NASA has finally admitted that the atmosphere extends beyond the moon so no, the spaceship does not continue in space without any forces acting on it. It would take dozens of fuel tanks to refuel a spaceship that was headed to the moon and back. You only believe all the junk you've been told. https://spacenews.com/earths-atmosphere-stretches-out-to-the-moon-and-beyond/

@Dixonaplanet Largest ever lie this moon landings are. I always knew it was fake once I went to school and learned chemistry, physics, and astronomy. Only naive fool would believe in such brazen and blatant lies of US government.

@PLUCK URANUS
you: i learned chemistry, physics, and astronomy.
chemistry, physics, and astronomy: he didn't learn us.

@myhat Let me guess, you learned about Santa, the Easter Bunny, and Jesus. You are on the right track.

@Dixonaplanet It is impossible for any rocket to go to the moon. It always has been. There is tons of proof. http://www.JayMc.com/FlatEarth

@Dixonaplanet thank you!

@MisterProgneto

"No, the Tsiolkovsky rocket equation actually proves that spaceflight to the Moon is possible. While it shows that a rocket's mass must grow exponentially with required velocity, engineers overcome this "tyranny of the rocket equation" by using multi-stage rockets—like the Saturn V—which shed empty fuel tanks along the way to reach the Moon."

@belzabub I was on the moon last night. I ain't kidding. My wife sat on my face...

@PLUCK URANUS sounds more like the moon was on you