IT is a valid responce.
For many decades a doctor has
been able to refer to clinical advice about patient care
whether it is in real time with the patient or looking up something at the end of the day to
brush up on knowledge.
There is no shame nor diminishing in this method of checking your knowledge and verifying - or finding alternate ways - to your current database.
I have had a couple of doctor / patient situations where the doctor referred to colleagues in the practice and then to
online searching for an answerr to what was a mysterious condition they had not seen before - even after 20-30 years practice.
An example is the appearance of
shingles
which itself is becoming much more commonly found with
life pressures and massive surprises - being sacked on the spot for example, - massive surprises and TOTALLY
unexpected outcomes in matters such as medical and general mental health shocks .
Not a problem that a doctor verifies their thoguhts and get more refined advice for you, the patient.
YOU couldn't find what they do, ya bitch.
ChatGPT Doctor
Posted on September 8, the clip shows the physician at a computer during the appointment, searching for cyst instructions, which struck many as unprepared. Viewers shared frustrations like doctors printing Google rash images or dismissing chronic illnesses, with some calling for AI replacements. Doctors counter that quick online checks for doses or guidelines are standard practice amid fast-changing medical knowledge, highlighting a need for better mid-visit communication.
givin blowies is a great way to feel better sweetheart... specially if ur on the other end
I want the AI Doctor that costs me $5 so I don't have to pay this worthless whore $150 to get my $4 prescription.
Who cares. Do what ya need to do to figure out wtf is going on with a mfer. Ya gotta google, then get to it, Doc.
Doctors have always been ignorant idiots regarding diseases and their causes; they only prescribe drugs and methods that others have tested experimentally.![]()
![]()
Whats new, my doctor uses Google already for 10 years, with AI it's only getting better. Not visiting him is even better.
Well it would be certainly better for a physician to know all diseases, all their symptoms, all the procedures/treatments, and all the cures. But that is not only just less and less possible, but was impossible from the beginning.
And there is a solid confusion among patients as of doctor-wannabes: just because a physician searches for sg. (btw directly, because he/she knows what to really look up for) on the internet, that does not make him/her stupider or less professional than you the patient are! You won't know, if the information available is really correct, and won't have a clue which treatment will be the fitting one for the specific case, your case. While the physician will possibly know when the info is misleading, or outright bullshit, you won't even notice, and get yourself a "treatment" what makes everything worse.
Just because a physician uses internet, that doesn't make you one, and certainly does not make you even just namely a better one.
Ask for second opinion(s), and it's not prohibited to (cross)check on things - but don't you ever think you can be better in a profession (most of the professions) learnt and worked for several years. At you responsibility you can refuse the specific treatment, but remember f.e. guessing the cancer type based upon what already happened in your family, then drinking miracle teas, because physicians are stooopid, is going to make everything for the worse..
Doctors are human beings, so they can be pricks, can have bad days, even years, may suck at work from the start or time after time, and sure, most won't admit even mistakes, if it can result losing the medical license. But even if you know a specific case, go into details no doctor can ever get - altogether for better chances, we should follow their orders.
Stupid fucks, this has ALWAYS been the way the medical system handled your care they just went in the back and looked it up in a book before
