Clancy Attorney Reddington and judge get into a shouting match during Trial


:) 8-) ;( :D :( :O :P ;) :heart: :ermm: :angel: :angry: :alien: :blink: :blush: :cheerful: :devil: :dizzy: :getlost: :happy: :kissing: :ninja: :pinch: :pouty: :sick: :sideways: :silly: :sleeping: :unsure: :woot: :wassat:
Duration: 2:53 Views: 950 Submitted: 3 hours ago Submitted by:
Was reddington trying to bully the judge
Add comment 5 comments
:) 8-) ;( :D :( :O :P ;) :heart: :ermm: :angel: :angry: :alien: :blink: :blush: :cheerful: :devil: :dizzy: :getlost: :happy: :kissing: :ninja: :pinch: :pouty: :sick: :sideways: :silly: :sleeping: :unsure: :woot: :wassat:
0 +1 JenesisPlanck 1 minute ago

I am making a good salary from home $4580-$5240/week , which is amazing und­er a year ago I was jobless in a horrible economy. I thank God every day I was blessed with these instructions and now its my duty to pay it forward and share it with Everyone,... :heart:

HERE—————⊃⫸ P­a­y­A­t­H­o­m­e­1­.­C­o­m

0 +1 petragloria 18 minutes ago

I get paid over $220 per hour working from home with 2 kids at home. i never thought i'd be able to do it but my best friend earns over 15k a month doing this and she convinced me to try. the potential with this is endless..., h8 :heart::heart::heart: This is what I do................. J­O­B­4­0.C­O­M

4 +1 OfficerDoofy 1 hour ago

Waste of my fucking time who the fuck posted this shit fuckin retard!

2 +1 Jukaithegod 2 hours ago

Wow! They were shouting very loud

0 +1 Amine666worldwatch 3 hours ago

Defense attorney Kevin Reddington accuses a juror of lying under oath in the Lindsay Clancy trial, claiming the juror promised to follow the law but is now refusing to apply the reasonable doubt standard during deliberations.

Prosecutors dispute that claim, arguing the juror's note does not say or indicate the juror lied.

"We have a person who, under their oath, stood in front of you yesterday when you did the individual voir dire, and according to this information under oath, looked you in the eye and lied... based on this note from this juror, it clearly and unequivocally indicates that they are basically 11 to 1."