WOW: The US "Railgun" is an Absolute BEAST!!


:) 8-) ;( :D :( :O :P ;) :heart: :ermm: :angel: :angry: :alien: :blink: :blush: :cheerful: :devil: :dizzy: :getlost: :happy: :kissing: :ninja: :pinch: :pouty: :sick: :sideways: :silly: :sleeping: :unsure: :woot: :wassat:
Duration: 1:06 Views: 8.2K Submitted: 5 days ago Submitted by:
The US Navy's electromagnetic railgun prototypes targeted ranges of 100-110 nautical miles (about 185-204 km) at 32 MJ muzzle energy, with potential for up to 200 nm at higher energies. The program was canceled in 2021 due to technical issues, but Trump's Dec 2025 battleship proposal hints at revival—though it's not operational yet.
Tags: war rail gun
Add comment 10 comments
:) 8-) ;( :D :( :O :P ;) :heart: :ermm: :angel: :angry: :alien: :blink: :blush: :cheerful: :devil: :dizzy: :getlost: :happy: :kissing: :ninja: :pinch: :pouty: :sick: :sideways: :silly: :sleeping: :unsure: :woot: :wassat:
0 +1 IdiotInWhitehouse 1 day ago

«so u just to unplug the power and the weapon is useless ?»

1 +1 D06B0N3 1 day ago

«This is 100% bullshit. Just more bullshit and lies TWW spreads»

3 +1 Hestkuk 3 days ago

«Fake»

6 +1 Comfortably_numb 3 days ago

«That tank is going to need a long extension cord, 10 gauge with 40 amps minimum.»

2 +1 phergus 3 days ago

«@Comfortably_numb And a couple honda generators taped to the skirts.»

4 +1 SupremeCmdr 3 days ago

«Half the visuals are sci-fi non sense. But it exists.
The US stopped developing the Rail Gun, as it needs retrofitting the barrel every dozen or so shots, which is not viable for the long operations the US navy does.
Japan though continues developing it.
»

6 +1 kma8675309 4 days ago

«Pop an EMP anywhere near the power source and the rail gun is DEAD.»

0 +1 GoDieInaFire 2 days ago

«@kma8675309 True Story»

6 +1 SirAbsolute 4 days ago

«This is old news, and currently unsuitable for mobile application (i.e. battleships, tanks, aircraft, etc), due to the huge power requirement and overheating issues...

No doubt they'll overcome these limitations in the not too distant future, and when they do, it will be one hell of a weapon for the US to have at its disposal.
»

13 +1 dingus369 4 days ago

«Lol only electricity they say. The ships would need a nuclear reactor to power these weapons and the reactor would be very vulnerable»

5 +1 ElMarko64 4 days ago

«@dingus369 We have nuclear powered ships now.»

4 +1 ulfsark9 4 days ago

«@dingus369 Yeah, we already have nuclear powered ships.
What you think our Submarines run on? Fucking diesel?
»

1 +1 McCunty 4 days ago

«Is this real or what???.»

12 +1 dingus369 4 days ago

«@McCunty Video is fake but the concept is real»

2 +1 LiveLockAndLoad 5 days ago

«I need it»