«What did you expect from a diversity hire that cant explain what a woman is»
SCOTUS is suppose to protect the people from the government.
«Here laws more specific to United States:
Obscenity: Speech that is considered obscene, as defined by the Miller test established by the Supreme Court, is not protected under the First Amendment.
Defamation: Speech that is false and injures someone's reputation is considered defamation and may be subject to legal action. However, public figures must prove actual malice to prevail in defamation lawsuits.
Incitement to Violence: Speech that incites imminent lawless action or poses a clear and present danger is not protected under the First Amendment.
True Threats: Speech that constitutes a true threat of violence against an individual or group is not protected under the First Amendment.
Hate Speech: Hate speech is generally protected under the First Amendment unless it directly incites violence or constitutes harassment.
Commercial Speech: Commercial speech, such as advertising, is subject to regulation to prevent false or misleading claims.
Time, Place, and Manner Restrictions: The government may impose reasonable restrictions on the time, place, and manner of speech to ensure public safety and order, as long as these restrictions are content-neutral and narrowly tailored.»
«Okay, just more talking heads. Clearly she has no idea of what the difference is between radical speech and freedom of speech. We already have laws to protect us from radical speech of all kinds. Had them for many, many years:
Hate Speech Laws: Many countries have laws that prohibit speech that incites violence or discrimination against individuals or groups based on characteristics such as race, religion, ethnicity, or nationality.
Incitement to Violence: Speech that directly encourages or advocates for violence against individuals or groups may be illegal in many jurisdictions.
Terrorism Laws: Some countries have specific laws targeting speech that promotes or supports terrorism, including radical ideologies associated with terrorist organizations.
Sedition Laws: Sedition laws may prohibit speech that seeks to overthrow the government or undermine its authority through unlawful means.
National Security Laws: Laws related to national security may restrict speech that is deemed to threaten the stability or security of the state.
Anti-Extremism Laws: Some countries have enacted laws specifically targeting extremist ideologies or organizations, which may include provisions related to radical speech.
Social Media Regulations: Some jurisdictions have implemented regulations or guidelines for online platforms to address radical or extremist content, including hate speech and incitement to violence.»
«it's amazing how the movie Idiocracy prophesied all of this shit, even down to a black president. Our top leaders are colored people, trans, and rich white people who are completely out of touch with the real world.»
«This is what happens when people are hired for their skin and sex instead of intelligence.»
«A society that admits free abortion as its culture... is a completely decadent and rotten society. »