https://theworldwatch.com/tags/joe-kent/ Tue 14 Apr 2026 12:12:04 +0200 https://theworldwatch.com/videos/1613866/joe-kent-issues-an-emergency-message-that-israel-will-attempt-to-sabotage-this-ceasefire-deal/
<div>He says now is the time to restrain Israel and cut off its military funding to stop it.</div> <div> </div> <div>He says Israel’s word should never be trusted because they are absolute liars.</div> ]]> Wed 08 Apr 2026 10:28:06 +0200 https://theworldwatch.com/videos/1613866/joe-kent-issues-an-emergency-message-that-israel-will-attempt-to-sabotage-this-ceasefire-deal/ https://theworldwatch.com/videos/1613376/whitney-webb-s-mind-blowing-theory-on-joe-kent-s-real-narrative-objective/
<div>Whitney Webb pitches mind-blowing theory on Joe Kent's real narrative purpose: engineer "anti-semitic, right-leaning domestic terrorists" to feed to the "pre-crime" machine: </div> <div> </div> <div>"[Kent's] an intelligence officer and top CIA guy."</div> <div> </div> <div>"Be careful in trusting 'former spooks' who come out of nowhere and are saying what you want to hear right away."</div> <div> </div> <div>"Basically, the first Trump administration defined the rising domestic terror threat because after 9/11 they've been building all this infrastructure for a war on domestic terror. Every administration has advanced it, Democrat and Republican. So who are they saying the domestic terrorists are? Anti-Semitic Right-leaning populists."</div> <div> </div> <div>"I worry when people from that exact nexus that existed in [Trump's first administration] come out and are trying to get Right-leaning populists in particular to do things that the Trump administration itself—even if no one else agrees with the definition—would define as anti-Semitic."</div> <div> </div> <div>This clip of Webb (</div> <div>@_whitneywebb</div> <div>), author of One Nation Under Blackmail and contributing editor of unlimitedhangout(.)com, is taken from an interview with Jimmy Dore (</div> <div>@jimmy_dore</div> <div>) posted to Rumble on March 26, 2026.</div> <div> </div> <div>----------------Partial transcription of clip---------------</div> <div> </div> <div>Dore: </div> <div> </div> <div>"What do you make of Joe Kent?"</div> <div> </div> <div>Webb: </div> <div> </div> <div>"Yeah, so with Joe Kent, he's a intelligence officer and top CIA guy. I think a lot of stuff is going on right now, and I'm not exactly sure how I feel about it. But I think people should be careful in trusting former, quote–unquote, former spooks who come out of nowhere and are saying what you want to hear right away. Because a lot of times what happens is that these figures will do that to build up trust with the public and then they'll misdirect you somewhere else if you're not careful.</div> <div> </div> <div>"So I would advise vigilance and critical thinking, which is often in short supply, but should not be, about, that figure in, in particular. But I think—</div> <div> </div> <div>Dore: </div> <div> </div> <div>"So you think there's like, there might be some kind of a long-game plan with Joe Kent?"</div> <div> </div> <div>Webb:</div> <div> </div> <div>"Oh, yeah. So you saw—"</div> <div> </div> <div>Dore: </div> <div> </div> <div>"So, so I've heard this argument and, and that you know, don't take him as face value, that they're just setting him up to be the next Trump or JD Vance or something and then he's going to do all the horrible thing. So that's—"</div> <div> </div> <div>Webb:</div> <div> </div> <div>"They could. It's very possible, but I don't know how it'll go. But let me give you an example of why I'm really skeptical of him.</div> <div> </div> <div>"So when Trump was, I encourage people to go back and look at the first iteration of the Trump administration to understand what's happening now. And since my career in journalism began during Trump's first term, I thankfully remember a good amount of it.</div> <div> </div> <div>"So, about a year before the January Six event, there was this DHS official and this is the Trump administration, Elizabeth Neuman, I think her name was. She was basically saying, there's going to be a domestic terror event. We can see it building, but we can't quite stop it. It's another 9/11. Oh no. If only we had more surveillance powers and whatever, we could maybe stop this other imminent 9/11, whatever.</div> <div> </div> <div>"And so basically in that hearing, it was a hearing where she was testifying. Top officials from DHS and, and other intelligence agencies were basically painting who is the up-and-coming domestic terrorist profile in the United States, what Americans are domestic terrorists.</div> <div> </div> <div>"And so basically, the— I, I really wish I could remember the specific name of the hearing to direct people to that because it is on C-SPAN, still. But basically, the profile they gave were anti-Semitic Trump supporters or anti-Semitic Right-leaning populists. So I worry when people from that exact nexus that existed in Trump One come out and are trying to get Right-leaning populists in particular to do things that the Trump administration itself, even if it, no one else agrees with the definition, would define as anti-Semitic."</div> <div> </div> <div>Dore: </div> <div> </div> <div>"So, so what I— explain that again to me because you lost me a little bit right at the end. So you're saying that—"</div> <div> </div> <div>Webb:</div> <div> </div> <div>"Okay, so basically the first Trump administration defined the rising domestic terror threat because after 9/11 they've been building all this infrastructure for a war on domestic terror. Every administration has advanced it, Democrat and Republican.  So who are they saying the domestic terrorists are? Anti-Semitic Right-leaning populists."</div> <div> </div> <div>Dore:</div> <div> </div> <div>"And so do you think Joe Kent is, is one of those?"</div> <div> </div> <div>Webb:</div> <div> </div> <div>"So before this era they had the domestic terror threat they were trying to put in front of you were obviously these groups of like Feds, like Patriot Front and the Proud Boys.  And all of that. Okay, so how, if you, if, if you can't fake the demographic, how do you engineer the demographic?...</div> <div> </div> <div>"So basically if you have Trump officials that are part of this apparatus claiming right-leaning anti- Semites are domestic terrorists that need to be targeted by this infrastructure and the surveillance infrastructure, in pre-crime and all of that, that's been a part of this buildup of the war on domestic terror. And then you have people coming out and being like we're going to blame, you know, you know, saying what people want to hear because obviously Israel absolutely is intimately involved with getting us involved in the Iran war.</div> <div> </div> <div>"But the other side of it is you create— you, you signal boost that with people like Joe Kent potentially. And then you have people sort of muddy the waters between Israel and all Jewish people, which is not fair. And then you can have the Trump administration swoop in and you know, look at Alexis Wilkins. Foreign government operators are driving these narratives.</div> <div> </div> <div>"It's, it's like reverse Russiagate. And well, I mean I probably should have thought this theory a little bit more before explaining it on your show, but basically I worry that someone like Joe Kent is coming out of, out of nowhere to try and sort of engineer this problem that the US Government has had is we can't make domestic terrorists appear that fit our profile.</div> <div> </div> <div>"So now we want people to create a class of right- leaning populists who basically fit our definition. If we just define anti-Semites as people who are critical of Israel and then we can target these people with our domestic terror infrastructure. So I worry that could be happening."</div> <div> </div> ]]> Fri 27 Mar 2026 07:57:40 +0200 https://theworldwatch.com/videos/1613376/whitney-webb-s-mind-blowing-theory-on-joe-kent-s-real-narrative-objective/ https://theworldwatch.com/videos/1613191/the-truth-about-the-joe-kent-vetting-mitch-snow-s-story/
The TRUTH About the Joe Kent "Vetting" Mitch Snow's STORY—The Calculated ATTACK on Joe Kent and Candace Owens Exposed The "anti-Candace" crowd and the fake-narrative spinners are trying to claim Joe Kent "illegally vetted" Mitch Snow. They couldn't be more wrong. This wasn't about "vetting" a guest for a show—it was about protecting the United States of America. THE REAL STORY: In my opinion when Mitch Snow came forward with sensitive information about Fort Huachuca, Candace Owens didn't just "chase a headline." She performed the ultimate act of due diligence. She refused to air a single word until she could ensure two things: Zero Risk to National Security: I believe she went to Joe Kent to ensure that sharing Mitch’s story wouldn't violate classified information laws or endanger our country. Federal Awareness: She put Joe Kent and the Federal government on notice of what Mitch saw, hoping to forcing an investigation into the federal government's own actions. that's what i think. THE FACTS vs. THE SPIN: Fact 1: It was a Legal Safeguard, not a "Favor." Candace sought out the National Counterterrorism Director to ensure she wasn't exposing secrets that could harm the nation. That isn't "shady"—it’s Responsible Patriotism. Fact 2: This VALIDATES Mitch Snow. Think about it: If Mitch’s story was "fake," why would the National Counterterrorism Director spend 15 minutes reviewing his records and give a "green light"? Joe Kent recognized the truth in those records immediately. Joe’s approval makes Mitch’s account MORE credible, not less. Fact 3: The "Trap" Question. The opposition is weaponizing a "trap" interview where Mitch was lured into using the word "vetted." They are trying to nail Joe Kent to the wall for doing his job: reviewing potential threats and ensuring transparency for the American people. THE BOTTOM LINE: Candace Owens and Joe Kent did exactly what "White Hats" are supposed to do. They communicated to ensure the truth reached the public legally and safely. The "retards" attacking them are just mad they don't have anything REAL to discredit @RealCandaceO , @Justice4Gr8Nate , or @joekent16jan19. They’re trying to discredit the Fort Huachuca story by attacking the messengers. The fact that the Director of Counterterrorism deemed it credible enough to move forward tells you everything you need to know. ]]> Mon 23 Mar 2026 19:51:04 +0200 https://theworldwatch.com/videos/1613191/the-truth-about-the-joe-kent-vetting-mitch-snow-s-story/ https://theworldwatch.com/videos/1613093/was-the-investigation-into-charlie-kirk-s-assassination-intentionally-sabotaged/
Was The INVESTIGATION Into Charlie Kirk’s Assassination Intentionally SABOTAGED? Former Counter-Terrorism Director Joe Kent just dropped a massive reveal on @MegynKellyShow . He confirms the NCTC was SHUT DOWN from pursuing viable leads involving foreign actors and government ties. The most chilling part? Multiple accounts predicted the exact date and method of the shooting days before it happened. "Extreme coincidence" or a coordinated hit? Joe Kent says the FBI and DOJ effectively killed the probe by letting it "die in process." Why is the government protecting the truth? ]]> Sat 21 Mar 2026 10:03:06 +0200 https://theworldwatch.com/videos/1613093/was-the-investigation-into-charlie-kirk-s-assassination-intentionally-sabotaged/ https://theworldwatch.com/videos/1613046/the-crowd-roars-as-joe-kent-revealed-why-in-good-conscience-he-could-not-send-our-young-men-and-women-to-fight-in-a-war-that-was-not-in-america-s-best-interest/
This was a top moment at the Catholics For Catholics event. ]]> Fri 20 Mar 2026 15:38:07 +0200 https://theworldwatch.com/videos/1613046/the-crowd-roars-as-joe-kent-revealed-why-in-good-conscience-he-could-not-send-our-young-men-and-women-to-fight-in-a-war-that-was-not-in-america-s-best-interest/ https://theworldwatch.com/videos/1613006/trump-lied-or-was-led-by-israel-joe-kent-admitted-that-iran-was-not-close-to-developing-a-nuclear-bomb-now-joe-kent-is-under-investigation-by-the-fbi-for-allegedly-leaking-classified-information/
<div>Tucker: "Was Iran on the verge of getting a nuclear weapon?"</div> <div> </div> <div>Joe Kent: "No. They weren't three weeks ago when this started, and they weren't in June either."</div> ]]> Fri 20 Mar 2026 09:54:59 +0200 https://theworldwatch.com/videos/1613006/trump-lied-or-was-led-by-israel-joe-kent-admitted-that-iran-was-not-close-to-developing-a-nuclear-bomb-now-joe-kent-is-under-investigation-by-the-fbi-for-allegedly-leaking-classified-information/ https://theworldwatch.com/videos/1613005/joe-kent-who-just-resigned-from-trump-admin-drops-bombshell-on-tucker-the-last-time-i-saw-charlie-kirk-on-this-earth-was-in-june-in-the-west-wing-he-looked-me-in-the-eye-and-said-joe-stop-us-from-getting-into-a-war-with-iran/
<div>“One of President Trump’s closest advisors was vocally advocating against war with Iran and for rethinking our relationship with Israel.”</div> <div> </div> <div>“And then he’s suddenly publicly assassinated and we’re not allowed to ask any questions about that?”</div> <div>“The investigation I was part of at the National Counterterrorism Center — we were stopped from continuing to investigate.”</div> <div> </div> <div>“Charlie was under a lot of pressure from a lot of pro-Israel donors. That’s in the texts that have been made public.”</div> <div> </div> <div>“There are unanswered questions.”</div> <div> </div> <div>The Director of America’s National Counterterrorism Center.</div> <div> </div> <div>Resigned this week because Iran posed no imminent threat.</div> <div> </div> <div>Is now saying a federal investigation into Charlie Kirk’s death was stopped.</div> <div> </div> <div>And that Kirk himself tried to prevent this war.</div> <div> </div> <div>This is not a rumor. This is sworn testimony from a senior intelligence official.</div> ]]> Fri 20 Mar 2026 09:49:57 +0200 https://theworldwatch.com/videos/1613005/joe-kent-who-just-resigned-from-trump-admin-drops-bombshell-on-tucker-the-last-time-i-saw-charlie-kirk-on-this-earth-was-in-june-in-the-west-wing-he-looked-me-in-the-eye-and-said-joe-stop-us-from-getting-into-a-war-with-iran/