<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> <rss version="2.0"> <channel> <title><![CDATA[Videos Tagged with uss abraham lincoln]]></title> <link>https://theworldwatch.com/tags/uss-abraham-lincoln/</link> <description><![CDATA[]]></description> <lastBuildDate>Thu 16 Apr 2026 00:25:05 +0200</lastBuildDate> <item> <title><![CDATA[ FAFO-USS Abraham Lincoln has been redirected to the Middle East from the South China ]]></title> <link>https://theworldwatch.com/videos/1609687/fafo-uss-abraham-lincoln-has-been-redirected-to-the-middle-east-from-the-south-china/</link> <description><![CDATA[ <a href="https://theworldwatch.com/videos/1609687/fafo-uss-abraham-lincoln-has-been-redirected-to-the-middle-east-from-the-south-china/"><img src="https://theworldwatch.com/contents/videos_screenshots/1609000/1609687/320x180/1.jpg" border="0"><br>WHAT THE LINCOLN'S DEPLOYMENT TELLS US ABOUT U.S. TIMING ON IRAN The USS Abraham Lincoln and three Arleigh Burke-class destroyers just got pulled from the South China Sea. At typical cruising speed, that's roughly a week to reach the Arabian Sea. So what does this mean for timing? Option one: the U.S. waits for the Lincoln, suggesting a larger sustained campaign with full carrier air power. That pushes any major action to late January. Option two: the U.S. acts before the Lincoln arrives using assets already in position, destroyers with Tomahawks in the Gulf and B-2 bombers from the continental U.S. like Operation Midnight Hammer last June. The Lincoln then provides follow-on capability for extended operations. The second option seems more likely. You don't reposition an entire carrier group from the Pacific for a symbolic one-night strike. The Lincoln's deployment signals Washington is preparing for something prolonged, not just a message.</a> ]]></description> <pubDate>Thu 15 Jan 2026 01:45:00 +0200</pubDate> <guid>https://theworldwatch.com/videos/1609687/fafo-uss-abraham-lincoln-has-been-redirected-to-the-middle-east-from-the-south-china/</guid> </item> </channel> </rss>